Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different possibilities for teens in light to the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
Most of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, which makes it hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. It also assumes that people who smoke don’t plan to do so.
The writer suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from that is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to obtain the same effect as smoking, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers may be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. It also means that they are taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the chance of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that people have already seen the unwanted effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports concerning the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have a lot of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a key point in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past few years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the level of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so because of other medical issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There Puff Bar are many reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it holds true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, some of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are located in the smokes. The author seems to be of the fact that all we need to do to solve the problem of smoking is to reduce the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not located in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the number of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.